Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /www/minitokyo/www/members/showposts.php on line 56
Blooming-Bunny's Forum Posts - Minitokyo

Login

Login

Need to register? Lost password?

Advertisements

Advertisements

 

Blooming-Bunny's Forum Posts

Minitokyo Post Archive

Minitokyo » Blooming-Bunny  Blooming-Bunny's Forum Posts

page 1 of 1
f

moved from another post since it was in the wrong place :sweat:

Well, Happy New Year. Logged in to find this message:

Quote: The wallpaper you have submitted was either too blurry, over filtered (i.e. an standard image or screencap with a few filters over it), or otherwise felt unsuitable. We only accept wallpapers where the members make a true effort to submit quality works for critiques and advice.

I was of course immediately disappointed, but I said, let me take a look at what is considered acceptable and see if I can make improvement to my own work for the next time. So I bop on over to the Seiyuu/J-pop/Idols area to look around, and I see this:

http://gallery.minitokyo.net/view/52722/

I think it's a very nice wallpaper for Hikki fans, but it leaves me stumped as to why my olivia wallpaper was deleted. (My WP can still be seen here: http://olivia.celestialusagi.net/images/wp05B.jpg Part of it originated from this scan: http://dear.angel.free.fr/gallery/olivia/ol119.JPG )

The feedback I had received on the wall was positive, and looking at what you allowed to remain, I really don't understand why it fell under the ax. Clarification would be appreciated.

f

Quote by streamside i really found
[Bot]Chii's automated message insulting/offending... there was
something in there like, she was saying, i only took 30 minutes to make
that wall... it's discouraging...

The actual quote from Chi is

Quote: We only accept wallpapers where the members make a true effort to submit quality works for critiques and advice.


I agree. That is incredibly insulting. We may not have reached an uber skill level, but that doesn't mean that we're not making a true effort. You really ought to rethink the wording on that one.

f

[MOVED - per mod's post below]

page 1 of 1